Geometry Boost List: By Date

Thread view	Subject view	Author view
Previous Folder, Date view	Next Folder, Date view	List of Folders

105 Messages
Starting:	2009-04-12 11:20:23	Ending:	2023-03-27 13:24:11

Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-29 22:16:58)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-29 14:04:03)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-29 14:04:02)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Simonson, Lucanus J (2012-02-28 18:56:14)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-28 18:51:43)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-28 18:31:50)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-28 09:31:58)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-24 12:19:14)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-22 18:43:33)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-22 18:28:56)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-22 11:53:22)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-22 11:27:53)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-22 08:40:49)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-21 19:31:53)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-21 18:42:32)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-21 14:38:04)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-21 11:43:39)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-20 18:21:34)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-20 08:03:39)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-19 22:05:15)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-19 21:41:23)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-18 11:16:45)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-17 11:10:29)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Bruno Lalande (2012-02-17 10:09:03)
Re: [geometry] intersects( polygon, box ) Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 18:07:04)
Re: [geometry] closed wrt closedness? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 18:05:01)
Re: [geometry] intersects( polygon, box ) Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 18:03:54)
Re: [geometry] numeric bounds? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 18:00:58)
Re: [geometry] closed wrt closedness? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 18:00:21)
Re: [geometry] numeric bounds? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 17:56:11)
Re: [geometry] closed wrt closedness? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 17:39:55)
[geometry] intersects( polygon, box ) Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 17:30:43)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Mateusz Loskot (2012-02-16 17:15:30)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Bruno Lalande (2012-02-16 16:34:38)
Re: [geometry] closed wrt closedness? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 16:08:28)
[geometry] closed wrt closedness? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 15:45:22)
[geometry] numeric bounds? Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 15:03:12)
Re: [geometry] "covered_by" for polygons Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 14:19:51)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 14:18:55)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 14:00:04)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Barend Gehrels (2012-02-16 14:10:11)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Mateusz Loskot (2012-02-16 10:45:26)
Re: [geometry] "covered_by" for polygons Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 09:45:15)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Bruno Lalande (2012-02-16 09:44:23)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Volker Schöch (2012-02-16 08:57:14)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Mateusz Loskot (2012-02-15 22:56:39)
Re: [geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Barend Gehrels (2012-02-15 18:40:45)
Re: [geometry] "covered_by" for polygons Barend Gehrels (2012-02-15 18:38:40)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Barend Gehrels (2012-02-15 18:30:50)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-15 18:15:31)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Volker SchÃ¶ch (2012-02-15 18:03:03)
Re: [geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Mateusz Loskot (2012-02-15 17:36:02)
[geometry] "covered_by" for polygons Volker Schöch (2012-02-15 17:31:28)
[geometry] Default model for Ring Concept should *be* Container, not inherit from it Volker Schöch (2012-02-15 16:58:17)
[geometry] one more variation to "transform"/"convert"/"for_each_point" Volker Schöch (2012-02-15 16:36:55)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-15 09:10:37)
Re: [geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-14 19:19:41)
[geometry] difference algorithm produces invalid polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-14 16:49:48)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-12 16:11:48)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-12 14:48:17)
Re: [geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Barend Gehrels (2012-02-11 18:00:43)
[geometry] Using Boost.Geometry with a legacy class hierarchy Mats Taraldsvik (2012-02-11 11:34:28)
Re: [geometry] Reliable invariants of geometry representation? Validation tests? Volker Schöch (2012-02-10 17:06:29)
Re: [geometry] Reliable invariants of geometry representation? Validation tests? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-10 15:27:15)
Re: [geometry] Reliable invariants of geometry representation? Validation tests? Volker Schöch (2012-02-10 10:49:57)
Re: [geometry] for_each_point and lambda with reference-captures in MSVC10 Volker Schöch (2012-02-10 09:45:30)
Re: [geometry] extensions Barend Gehrels (2012-02-09 19:17:16)
Re: [geometry] Reliable invariants of geometry representation? Validation tests? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-09 19:11:42)
Re: [geometry] for_each_point and lambda with reference-captures in MSVC10 Barend Gehrels (2012-02-09 18:46:28)
Re: [geometry] for_each_point and lambda with reference-captures in MSVC10 Barend Gehrels (2012-02-09 18:41:40)
[geometry] Reliable invariants of geometry representation? Validation tests? Volker Schöch (2012-02-09 17:01:32)
[geometry] for_each_point and lambda with reference-captures in MSVC10 Volker Schöch (2012-02-09 13:42:02)
Re: [geometry] extensions Krzysztof Czainski (2012-02-09 11:44:53)
Re: [geometry] Bounding box checked first? Sebastian (2012-02-09 08:17:12)
Re: [geometry] extensions Bruno Lalande (2012-02-08 22:48:25)
Re: [geometry] Bounding box checked first? Bruno Lalande (2012-02-08 22:42:37)
Re: [geometry] Warnings (Microsoft Visual C++ 2010) Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 21:10:30)
Re: [geometry] extensions Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 18:49:06)
Re: [geometry] Suggestion for doc: intersects vs. overlaps Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 18:37:41)
[geometry] Warnings (Microsoft Visual C++ 2010) Volker Schöch (2012-02-08 18:35:17)
Re: [geometry] point_on_border not implemented for multi_polygon? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 18:34:30)
Re: [geometry] Bounding box checked first? Simonson, Lucanus J (2012-02-08 18:23:48)
Re: [geometry] covered_by not in 1.48.0? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 18:19:13)
Re: [geometry] Bounding box checked first? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-08 18:13:47)
[geometry] Suggestion for doc: intersects vs. overlaps Volker Schöch (2012-02-08 12:42:07)
[geometry] point_on_border not implemented for multi_polygon? Volker Schöch (2012-02-08 12:33:15)
Re: [geometry] covered_by not in 1.48.0? Volker Schöch (2012-02-08 10:52:34)
[geometry] Bounding box checked first? Sebastian (2012-02-08 10:20:04)
Re: [geometry] extensions Bruno Lalande (2012-02-08 09:40:37)
Re: [geometry] Use same object as input and output parameter? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-07 19:26:14)
Re: [geometry] covered_by not in 1.48.0? Barend Gehrels (2012-02-07 19:09:08)
Re: [geometry] extensions Barend Gehrels (2012-02-07 19:02:54)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon Barend Gehrels (2012-02-07 18:49:44)
[geometry] Use same object as input and output parameter? Volker Schöch (2012-02-07 18:06:32)
[geometry] covered_by not in 1.48.0? Volker Schöch (2012-02-07 18:01:09)
Re: [geometry] extensions Krzysztof Czainski (2012-02-07 16:51:56)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon Sebastian (2012-02-07 13:12:02)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon Sebastian (2012-02-07 10:13:25)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon edd cmaugo (2012-02-07 09:42:03)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon Sebastian (2012-02-07 09:30:17)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon edd cmaugo (2012-02-07 08:42:21)
Re: [geometry] Intersection of linestring with polygon Sebastian (2012-02-07 08:27:09)
Re: [geometry] union of 2 polygons is wrong.AND an now a DISTANCE bug Barend Gehrels (2012-02-04 15:26:34)
Re: [geometry] union of 2 polygons is wrong.AND an now a DISTANCE bug Zachary Deretsky (2012-02-04 00:04:15)
Re: [geometry] union of 2 polygons is wrong.AND an intersect bug Barend Gehrels (2012-02-03 22:19:22)

Last message date:	2023-03-27 13:24:11	Archived on:	2023-03-27 13:24:19 UTC

Thread view	Subject view	Author view
Previous Folder, Date view	Next Folder, Date view	List of Folders