Subject: Re: [Boost-users] generalize boost macros
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-02 19:03:17
On 2/1/19 1:08 PM, John Maddock via Boost-users wrote:
> There has been some work towards making the library constexpr throughout
> where possible: but I came to the conclusion that it wasn't possible
> without is_constant_evaluated() from C++20. numeric_limits<float128>
> might be possible though.
Hmm - I've heard that gcc already implements is_constant_evaluated().
Could be wrong though. In any case, the capability in the works for
HAS_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED? or similar? I think I could benefit from it
right now.
Robert Ramey