Subject: Re: [Boost-users] generalize boost macros
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-01 21:08:35
multiprecision/float128_t:
> there are still many features missing
Specifically?
> most values ​​in numeric_limits<float128_t> are not constexpr
I know :(
There has been some work towards making the library constexpr throughout
where possible: but I came to the conclusion that it wasn't possible
without is_constant_evaluated() from C++20. numeric_limits<float128>
might be possible though.
>
> math::constants:
> i miss log2(2/e/pi/10) etc
Not sure I follow, do you really mean log2(2) ??
Best, John.
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus