Subject: Re: [Boost-users] intrusive_ptr vs shared-ptr
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-20 08:32:33
> Yes for a large I support that, but in some respects intrusive_ptr's have some
> benefit over shared_ptr's (e.g. you cannot pass a shared_ptr of urslef in ctor's
> etc.)
OTOH, intrusive_ptr doesn't have a weak_ptr counterpart -- and this is
much more problematic, imho.