Subject: Re: [Boost-users] intrusive_ptr vs shared-ptr
From: gast128 (gast128_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-19 17:54:25
Igor R <boost.lists <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Because shared_ptr doesn't require *any* additional code (which should
> be designed, implemented, tested, supported, etc).
Yes for a large I support that, but in some respects intrusive_ptr's have some
benefit over shared_ptr's (e.g. you cannot pass a shared_ptr of urslef in ctor's
etc.)