From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-16 10:22:16
gast128 wrote:
> O thanks. I completely missed that section.
>
> Now I have to tell the programmers here, that there is still use for auto_ptr.
> I had them make believe that boost's smart_ptr's are superior in every way,
> but I obviously forgot this case.
The goal wasn't to replace auto_ptr, but to complement it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com