From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-16 09:34:01
On Dec 16, 2004, at 3:49 AM, gast128 wrote:
> O thanks. I completely missed that section.
>
> Now I have to tell the programmers here, that there is still use for
> auto_ptr.
> I had them make believe that boost's smart_ptr's are superior in every
> way,
> but I obviously forgot this case.
Fwiw, Jonathan's move_ptr is superior to auto_ptr, and can completely
replace it.
-Howard