Boost testing mailing page: By Author

Date view	Thread view	Subject view
Previous Folder, Author view	Next Folder, Author view	List of Folders

178 Messages
Starting:	2004-10-11 09:47:56	Ending:	2023-07-28 00:03:55

Aleksey Gurtovoy
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-21 04:35:39)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Purpose of expected_results.xml ? (2007-02-16 05:53:35)
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-12 06:17:42)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Boost Regression Testing (2007-02-02 07:00:44)
AlisdairM
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-14 20:40:02)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Regression policy for mainline? (2007-02-11 22:04:38)
- [Boost-testing] Unsupportable libraries? (2007-02-08 16:51:12)
- [Boost-testing] Speedsnail-dbg obsolete? (2007-02-07 20:12:47)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Very strange regression results for borland (2007-02-06 08:10:07)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Very strange regression results for borland (2007-02-06 05:52:55)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dy namic_bitset failure (2007-02-03 10:57:53)
Anthony Williams
- Re: [Boost-testing] gcc-mingw-3.4.2 linker complains about "auto-import" (2007-02-26 08:34:17)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-03 09:29:41)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 22:03:03)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-02 22:01:08)
Beman Dawes
- [Boost-testing] [1.34.0][Martin Wille V2] filesystem Intel shared library tests failing (2007-02-02 13:23:45)
- [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][filesystem] msvc-80 path_test results problem (2007-02-02 13:11:23)
Boris Gubenko
- Re: [Boost-testing] [mpl] marking copy expected failure onHP-UX/aCC6 : 2nd try (2007-02-28 15:09:35)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [iostreams] patch for wide_streams.hpp for HP-UX : 2nd try (2007-02-28 00:19:39)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [mpl] marking copy expected failure on HP-UX/aCC6 : 2nd try (2007-02-27 23:54:27)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [python] marking data_members expected failure onHP-UX/aCC6 : 2nd (actually, 3rd) try (2007-02-27 23:51:14)
- [Boost-testing] [iostreams] patch for wide_streams.hpp for HP-UX (2007-02-25 03:51:14)
- [Boost-testing] [mpl] marking copy expected failure on HP-UX/aCC6 (2007-02-24 21:39:22)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-19 01:26:58)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expectedfailuresonHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-17 18:14:21)
- [Boost-testing] [iterator] marking is_lvalue_iterator expected failure on HP-UX/aCC6 (2007-02-17 00:24:53)
- [Boost-testing] [python] marking data_members expected failure on HP-UX/aCC6 (2007-02-16 23:55:41)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-16 23:32:58)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-16 23:24:17)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-16 22:47:10)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-16 21:17:30)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-15 19:57:02)
- [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-15 18:45:33)
Bronek Kozicki
- Re: [Boost-testing] Very strange regression results for borland (2007-02-06 07:29:25)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-05 09:52:30)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-05 09:45:00)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-04 21:50:00)
Caleb Epstein
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-04 05:13:14)
Daniel James
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-26 19:04:17)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (was: [Report] 116 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-02-22)) (2007-02-25 15:50:58)
David Abrahams
- [Boost-testing] [test][range][BBv2?] issues with sub_range test (2007-02-28 20:55:42)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-24 04:43:44)
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-23 17:09:46)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-23 15:55:36)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-21 18:34:05)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-20 16:43:44)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-06 21:46:27)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-06 17:45:08)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-06 17:27:00)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-06 17:23:46)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-05 02:42:39)
- [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-05 02:33:10)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-05 02:32:01)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-04 17:21:03)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-04 17:16:42)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-03 19:49:51)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-03 16:51:48)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-03 14:32:51)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-03 14:07:58)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][filesystem] msvc-80 path_test results problem (2007-02-03 01:51:26)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Where are my results? (2007-02-03 01:51:01)
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-03 01:41:43)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][filesystem] msvc-80 path_test results problem (2007-02-03 01:39:31)
- [Boost-testing] Where are my results? (2007-02-03 01:38:00)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-02 18:41:16)
- [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-02 18:29:39)
Eric Niebler
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-26 20:44:35)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-26 02:18:32)
- [Boost-testing] 2nd try: [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-24 17:45:09)
- [Boost-testing] [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (was: [Report] 116 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-02-22)) (2007-02-22 18:13:58)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (2007-02-12 17:40:50)
- [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (was: [Report] 499 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-02-11)) (2007-02-11 17:25:30)
Gennadiy Rozental
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-04 08:22:14)
Hartmut Kaiser
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Report] 143 regressions on RC_1_34_0(2007-02-19) (2007-02-21 00:47:35)
- [Boost-testing] [Wave] RTTI problems with VC7.1 again (2007-02-19 21:14:05)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] [Report] 143 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-02-19) (2007-02-19 19:29:17)
- [Boost-testing] [Wave] Sun5.8 regression caused by program_options lib (2007-02-11 18:05:45)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [1.34.0][Martin Wille V2] filesystem Intel sharedlibrary tests failing (2007-02-02 14:02:49)
Jeff Garland
- [Boost-testing] 1.34 checkin for testtz_database/date_time_zonespec.csv (2007-02-20 03:44:11)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-18 21:43:46)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failuresonHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-17 17:35:52)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-16 23:28:43)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failures onHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-16 23:16:04)
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
- [Boost-testing] Bad entry page to RC_1_34_0 regressions (2007-02-19 21:31:57)
- [Boost-testing] [repost][test][msvc-6.5_stlport4][speedsnail-msvc-dp] should we force static linking for Boost.Test on MSVC++ 6.5 + STLport? (2007-02-15 19:53:41)
- [Boost-testing] [Martin Wille V2] Intel 9.0 DLL linking problem still present (2007-02-11 12:26:36)
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz
- Re: [Boost-testing] [repost][test][msvc-6.5_stlport4][speedsnail-msvc-dp] should we force static linking for Boost.Test on MSVC++ 6.5 + STLport? (2007-02-19 09:03:12)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [repost][test][msvc-6.5_stlport4][speedsnail-msvc-dp] should we force static linking for Boost.Test on MSVC++ 6.5 + STLport? (2007-02-15 21:01:12)
- [Boost-testing] [test][msvc-6.5_stlport4][speedsnail-msvc-dp] should we force static linking for Boost.Test on MSVC++ 6.5 + STLport? (2007-02-12 22:00:04)
- Re: [Boost-testing] msvc-6.5_stlport4 needs to be declared as an alias in libs/expected_results.xml (2007-02-12 08:54:34)
- [Boost-testing] msvc-6.5_stlport4 needs to be declared as an alias in libs/expected_results.xml (2007-02-10 12:04:12)
Joaquin M Lopez MuÃ±oz
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-03 15:43:04)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-03 13:32:28)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Where are my results? (2007-02-03 12:56:17)
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz
- [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-02 07:25:40)
John Maddock
- [Boost-testing] Test monitor timeout - can we tell when it occurs? (2007-02-20 13:32:05)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] Regressions fix. (2007-02-19 10:01:41)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [date_time] marking tests as expected failuresonHP-UX/aCC (2007-02-17 09:47:43)
- [Boost-testing] Regressions fix. (2007-02-16 16:52:33)
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-14 16:43:07)
- Re: [Boost-testing] More toolsets? msvc-6.5-stlport (2007-02-05 10:04:37)
- [Boost-testing] More toolsets? msvc-6.5-stlport (2007-02-04 17:16:35)
K. Noel Belcourt
- Re: [Boost-testing] 2nd try: [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-24 20:24:22)
- [Boost-testing] Removing old results from summary page? (2007-02-15 22:46:30)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-15 18:56:33)
Markus Schöpflin
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-16 09:12:31)
Martin Wille
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-14 17:46:48)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Martin Wille V2] Intel 9.0 DLL linking problem still present (2007-02-13 09:22:03)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-03 17:38:50)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py doesn't accept --dont-send-bjam-log (2007-02-02 08:16:55)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py doesn't accept --dont-send-bjam-log (2007-02-02 07:53:58)
- [Boost-testing] regression.py doesn't accept --dont-send-bjam-log (2007-02-02 04:56:08)
Misha Berga;
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-05 17:51:20)
Misha Bergal
- Re: [Boost-testing] [Report] 143 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-02-19) (2007-02-20 10:53:21)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Bad entry page to RC_1_34_0 regressions (2007-02-20 10:52:32)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-16 20:54:02)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-16 20:52:43)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-07 02:45:20)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-07 02:08:45)
- Re: [Boost-testing] False failures? (2007-02-07 02:07:59)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-05 21:36:21)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py and --incremental (2007-02-04 19:59:26)
Nicola Musatti
- [Boost-testing] Which SP for VC++6 do regression runners use? (2007-02-08 13:17:40)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-03 09:06:27)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 17:37:06)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 16:22:31)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [1.34.0][Martin Wille V2] filesystem Intel shared library tests failing (2007-02-02 14:44:00)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-02 13:14:43)
- [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 13:06:28)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-01 16:50:08)
- [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-01 15:21:35)
Rene Rivera
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-05 03:32:02)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-04 16:31:11)
Roland Schwarz
- [Boost-testing] gcc-mingw-3.4.2 linker complains about "auto-import" (2007-02-25 10:02:19)
- [Boost-testing] python and gcc-cygwin-3.4.4 (2007-02-23 11:17:32)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Purpose of expected_results.xml ? (2007-02-16 08:10:42)
- [Boost-testing] Purpose of expected_results.xml ? (2007-02-15 12:42:50)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [msvc-6.5_stlport4] stale obj file? (2007-02-14 16:23:54)
- Re: [Boost-testing] 4th try: A plea for Report Usability (2007-02-14 16:03:48)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (2007-02-13 08:02:52)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (2007-02-11 17:58:10)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py bootstrapping broken on cygwin? (2007-02-10 17:55:25)
- [Boost-testing] regression.py bootstrapping broken on cygwin? (2007-02-10 16:07:14)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Which SP for VC++6 do regression runners use? (2007-02-08 14:18:38)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Speedsnail-dbg obsolete? (2007-02-08 06:43:10)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Very strange regression results for borland (2007-02-06 07:54:02)
- [Boost-testing] Very strange regression results for borland (2007-02-06 05:12:11)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Build monitor killed my test? (2007-02-05 06:50:20)
- Re: [Boost-testing] More toolsets? msvc-6.5-stlport (2007-02-04 17:29:24)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-03 16:07:53)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][numeric/interval] misleading toolset name (2007-02-03 15:03:03)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Where are my results? (2007-02-03 12:55:21)
- [Boost-testing] Automatically getting rid of stalled regressions? (2007-02-02 17:10:13)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 17:01:16)
- Re: [Boost-testing] JustSoftwareSolutions Borland failures (2007-02-02 14:12:19)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-02 14:09:49)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-01 18:43:56)
- Re: [Boost-testing] speedsnail-dbg's Borland 5.8.2 dynamic_bitset failure (2007-02-01 15:34:06)
Sean Huang
- [Boost-testing] [1.34.0] intel-vc8-win-9.1 errors (2007-02-22 07:41:55)
Thomas Witt
- [Boost-testing] [Fwd: Boost inspection notification (2007-02-21/RC_1_34_0) *X*] (2007-02-21 17:14:27)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [boost] Regressions fix. (2007-02-19 15:29:54)
- [Boost-testing] [msvc-6.5_stlport4] stale obj file? (2007-02-14 15:49:23)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (2007-02-14 02:39:57)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [SpeedSnail] STLPort config error? (2007-02-12 20:26:14)
- Re: [Boost-testing] More toolsets? msvc-6.5-stlport (2007-02-06 02:59:39)
- Re: [Boost-testing] Automatically getting rid of stalled regressions? (2007-02-03 00:22:20)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [BoostConsulting][filesystem] msvc-80 path_test results problem (2007-02-03 00:20:30)
Victor A. Wagner Jr.
- [Boost-testing] My system is back up (2007-02-19 02:22:54)
Vladimir Prus
- Re: [Boost-testing] 2nd try: [Sandia] intel-linux-9.0 and foreach (2007-02-25 10:57:19)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [mpl] marking copy expected failure on HP-UX/aCC6 : 2nd try (2007-02-28 07:11:29)
- [Boost-testing] Cleaning regression logs (2007-02-19 19:35:25)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-17 05:49:59)
- Re: [Boost-testing] [repost][test][msvc-6.5_stlport4][speedsnail-msvc-dp] should we force static linking for Boost.Test on MSVC++ 6.5 + STLport? (2007-02-15 20:32:17)
- Re: [Boost-testing] exception from regression.py (2007-02-15 19:08:08)
- [Boost-testing] [1.34.0] intel 9.0 dll linking (2007-02-06 18:32:48)
- [Boost-testing] [1.34.0] JustSoftwareSolutions-debug (2007-02-06 17:35:22)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py doesn't accept --dont-send-bjam-log (2007-02-02 07:59:52)
- Re: [Boost-testing] regression.py doesn't accept --dont-send-bjam-log (2007-02-02 06:47:44)

Last message date:	2023-07-28 00:03:55	Archived on:	2023-07-28 00:04:04 UTC

Date view	Thread view	Subject view
Previous Folder, Author view	Next Folder, Author view	List of Folders