From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-06 04:34:57
Rene Rivera wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>>> We could "cheat" by replacing the v1 source files with a zipball -- that
>>>> wouldn't generate any inspection failures.
>>> I'm all for just removing them. AFAIK the only reason they are still
>>> around is that there are testers still using BBv1.
>> Well if there are, that's gotta stop. They're not even getting
>> complete results anymore; I have stopped maintaining v1 Jamfiles.
>
> Well one way to make them stop is to remove the files :-) And by them
> AFAICT it at least refers to:
>
> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/COMSOFT.html
> http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/HP%20TestDrive.html
What makes you think so? I've been running with V2 for ages now.
Markus