From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-05 11:15:04
David Abrahams wrote:
> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>> We could "cheat" by replacing the v1 source files with a zipball -- that
>>> wouldn't generate any inspection failures.
>> I'm all for just removing them. AFAIK the only reason they are still
>> around is that there are testers still using BBv1.
>
> Well if there are, that's gotta stop. They're not even getting
> complete results anymore; I have stopped maintaining v1 Jamfiles.
Well one way to make them stop is to remove the files :-) And by them
AFAICT it at least refers to:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/COMSOFT.html
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/HP%20TestDrive.html
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/JustSoftwareSolutions.html
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/metacomm.html
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/metacomm2.html
There may be others.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo