From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 18:32:58
On 2019-12-04 19:01, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Vinnie Falco wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:42 PM Peter Dimov via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit
>> that > changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.
>>
>> I don't feel strongly about it either way, but since when is data()
>> guaranteed to be unique per instance?
>
> This is a property of the implementation that is no longer true after
> the change. It may not have been "guaranteed" but it was true.
I don't think it should be guaranteed.