From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-04 16:01:02
Vinnie Falco wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:42 PM Peter Dimov via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit that
> > changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.
>
> I don't feel strongly about it either way, but since when is data()
> guaranteed to be unique per instance?
This is a property of the implementation that is no longer true after the
change. It may not have been "guaranteed" but it was true.