Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 23:30:02
On 7/14/2015 7:43 AM, Ralf Globisch wrote:
>> In that case, "symbol loader" or "shared library loader" would be more
>> fitting than "loader" which
>>> could be about other domains.
>
> I was also thinking along the lines of LL for either Lib Loader or Library Loader.
>
> Or maybe PLL (Platform-independent Library Loader) might be a phonetic option
> that shows some relationship to DLL but is different enough?
>
>> Personally I don't care much about the name of the library in this case
>> because almost all the names evoked here seems fine to me,
>> event the platform-specific evocation ones.
>
> +1
>
Perhaps you could call it Dynamic Library Loader.
And then refer to it using the acronym DLL.