Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing
From: Ralf Globisch (rglobisch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 08:43:53
> In that case, "symbol loader" or "shared library loader" would be more
> fitting than "loader" which
>> could be about other domains.
I was also thinking along the lines of LL for either Lib Loader or Library Loader.
Or maybe PLL (Platform-independent Library Loader) might be a phonetic option
that shows some relationship to DLL but is different enough?
> Personally I don't care much about the name of the library in this case
> because almost all the names evoked here seems fine to me,
> event the platform-specific evocation ones.
+1
-- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email.