Subject: Re: [boost] [move][unique_ptr] c++14 unique_ptr comes to town
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-03 16:33:13
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> One problem I've found for constructors taking the pointer is that the
> pointer can be an incomplete type whereas has_trivial_destructor requires
> a complete type.
Are we in the default_delete case here, or in the arbitrary deleter case?