Subject: Re: [boost] [move][unique_ptr] c++14 unique_ptr comes to town
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-03 16:05:14
El 03/09/2014 13:16, Ion Gaztañaga escribió:
>> has_virtual_destructor is the correct one. It's a later addition and the
>> implementation on which I prototyped probably didn't have it.
>
> Ok, this requires a compiler intrinsic, but I can add it to my
> unique_ptr implementation.
One problem I've found for constructors taking the pointer is that the
pointer can be an incomplete type whereas has_trivial_destructor
requires a complete type.
We could apply it to reset() and the assignment, but without
constructors IMHO we miss the most used functions.
Ion