Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 12:28:14
DE wrote:
> it seems reasonable
> but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be
> readable
> even more readable acually
>
> set(m, list(x, y), val);
>
> or even
>
> set(m, list(x, y)) = val
how can this be more readable than m(x,y) = val ???
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35