Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 12:21:51
on 18.08.2009 at 20:10
joel wrote :
> It could be beneficial for the discussion if you weren't ditching stuff
> all together with not reading what's written.
> I was porposing to reuse the concept of cartesian product of indexes ...
sorry for my dumbness
i misread your message
it seems reasonable
but it can be implemented through non-member function and still be
readable
even more readable acually
set(m, list(x, y), val);
or even
set(m, list(x, y)) = val;
-- Pavel