Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] shared_ptr template type
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-17 01:57:05
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Frank Mori Hess<frank.hess_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 16 July 2009, Gottlob Frege wrote:
>> - Maybe a more generic smart_ptr IS what we need (ie towards Loki
>> policy-based SmartPtr). Particularly since I've seen the same
>> discussion about intrusive_ptr. Or maybe not. It is worth
>> considering. One ptr to rule them all? (There would still be the
>> specialized smart_ptr and intrusive_ptr of course, for simplicity and
>> compatibility.)
>
> I suggest searching the archives of this mailing list for background first.
> For example, there were many long threads about this in 2002, for example:
>
> http://listarchives.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/12/22063.php
>
That is somewhat my point - the topic keeps coming up, so maybe we
should finally do it. (Or maybe we need a FAQ saying "don't go
there".)
In 2002 there seemed to be lots of policy design discussion. It would
be interesting to know if we've learned anything over the years.
Tony