Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] shared_ptr template type
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-16 08:40:22
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 16 July 2009, Gottlob Frege wrote:
> - Maybe a more generic smart_ptr IS what we need (ie towards Loki
> policy-based SmartPtr). Particularly since I've seen the same
> discussion about intrusive_ptr. Or maybe not. It is worth
> considering. One ptr to rule them all? (There would still be the
> specialized smart_ptr and intrusive_ptr of course, for simplicity and
> compatibility.)
I suggest searching the archives of this mailing list for background first.
For example, there were many long threads about this in 2002, for example:
http://listarchives.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/12/22063.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkpfH7YACgkQ5vihyNWuA4V3PgCfVP9FB8/JEcwl+cOWEjFdLLW9
iMwAoIRxqrgZRT0K8eMzAxtR7dAfti2Z
=DFLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----