Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 10:02:57
on Sun Nov 23 2008, "Daniel James" <daniel_james-AT-fmail.co.uk> wrote:
> 2008/11/23 Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>> Hence we need two different implementations. That is exactly what I
>> proposed.
>
> There's no reason that they both have to be in boost. Boost range
> should let you use your own range class.
That is another option.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com