Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 05:36:48
2008/11/23 Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Hence we need two different implementations. That is exactly what I
> proposed.
There's no reason that they both have to be in boost. Boost range
should let you use your own range class.
Daniel