From: Marcus Lindblom (macke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-31 08:19:00
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On May 31, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>
>> Additionally, one could also set up a completely different repository
>> for the sandbox, to make logs/history less cluttered. Has that been
>> considered?
>>
>
> It was. We (I?) decided to put it into the same Subversion
> repository, so that it would be easy to keep all of the sandbox
> history for a library when it is accepted into Boost. With
> SourceForge, this was a real pain: we had to either beg SF staff to
> move over the CVS history, or we had to just re-import and lose easy
> access to that history. Subversion dumpfiles can make this a little
> easier, and the Subversion server is under our control now, but it
> still requires user intervention.
>
Ok. That makes sense. I didn't think about the sandbox as a
"soon-to-be-boostified" storage, but rather as a wild playground. :)
Cheers,
/Marcus