From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-31 07:20:25
On May 31, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
> Additionally, one could also set up a completely different repository
> for the sandbox, to make logs/history less cluttered. Has that been
> considered?
It was. We (I?) decided to put it into the same Subversion
repository, so that it would be easy to keep all of the sandbox
history for a library when it is accepted into Boost. With
SourceForge, this was a real pain: we had to either beg SF staff to
move over the CVS history, or we had to just re-import and lose easy
access to that history. Subversion dumpfiles can make this a little
easier, and the Subversion server is under our control now, but it
still requires user intervention.
- Doug