From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-25 12:02:50
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> 1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double'
> Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they?
> perhaps double or float but what else?
>
I was thinking of any float-like type, but that's an interesting question.
I'm afraid I don't have enough expertise to answer it - do any of these
algorithms make sense for other numeric fields, (e.g., finite fields)?