From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-25 11:06:55
Neal Becker wrote:
> 1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double'
Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they?
perhaps double or float but what else?
> 3. Does support of complex make any sense here?
I would rather like to see multivalued functions.
But complex of course could also turn out to be handy at times.
Roland