From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-19 05:49:47
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Andy Little wrote:
>
>>"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so
>>>default
>>>arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is
>>>greater or
>>>equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
>>
>>
>>Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the
>>default args, at least not in my test above.
>>(OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)
>
>
>
> <WHUMMM>Stupid me</WHUMM>
>
> Of course!
>
>
You can, however, check if it's a variadic function pointer and in this call
allow any number of tuple elements....
Regards,
Tobias