From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 15:42:55
Andy Little wrote:
>
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>
>> Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so
>> default
>> arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is
>> greater or
>> equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
>
>
> Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the
> default args, at least not in my test above.
> (OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)
<WHUMMM>Stupid me</WHUMM>
Of course!
I'm sorry. It seems I'm doing too much things simultanously at present...
Regards,
Tobias