From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-09 12:18:42
On Jun 9, 2005, at 11:49 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> It seems to me that when BOOST_TYPEOF becomes available,
> boost::result_of should use it in its default implementation,
> something like:
>
> template <class F, class A>
> struct result_of<F(A)>
> {
> typedef typename BOOST_TYPEOF(make<F>() ( make<A>() ) ) type;
> };
>
> Is that in the plan?
Absolutely.
Doug