[boost] [typeof][result_of] Separated at Birth?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-09 11:49:50

It seems to me that when BOOST_TYPEOF becomes available,
boost::result_of should use it in its default implementation,
something like:

  template <class F, class A>
  struct result_of<F(A)>
  {
      typedef typename BOOST_TYPEOF(make<F>() ( make<A>() ) ) type;
  };

Is that in the plan?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com