From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-04 18:36:20
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Of course f = t; is merely a shorthand way of spelling f =
>> boost::lambda::constant(t), but a dependency on lambda isn't always
>> desirable.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> By the same token, one could argue that this functionality ought to
> be pushed into boost::bind.
I'm not sure what you mean. What functionality ought to be pushed into
boost::bind?