From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-04 18:24:36
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Of course f = t; is merely a shorthand way of spelling f =
> boost::lambda::constant(t), but a dependency on lambda isn't always
> desirable.
>
> Thoughts?
By the same token, one could argue that this functionality ought to
be pushed into boost::bind.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com