From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-13 09:36:21
Daniel Wallin <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Yeah, sure, I'm interested. I still hope whoever's doing this won't
>> overlook free functions like swap ;-).
>
> I checked it in to the sandbox.
>
> boost/result_check.hpp
> boost/libs/utility/test/result_check_test.cpp
>
> It's missing a simple way to somehow specialize for fundamental types..
I don't understand why you'd want that. But maybe I don't understand
what "that" is.
> check_swap<> can be written:
>
> BOOST_RESULT_CHECK(2, swap, swap, swap(_1, _2))
> arity ---^ ^ ^ ^
> trait name --------' | |
> overload name --------------' |
> expression --------------------'
>
> --
> Daniel Wallin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com