From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-13 05:38:13
David Abrahams wrote:
> Yeah, sure, I'm interested. I still hope whoever's doing this won't
> overlook free functions like swap ;-).
I checked it in to the sandbox.
boost/result_check.hpp
boost/libs/utility/test/result_check_test.cpp
It's missing a simple way to somehow specialize for fundamental types..
check_swap<> can be written:
BOOST_RESULT_CHECK(2, swap, swap, swap(_1, _2))
arity ---^ ^ ^ ^
trait name --------' | |
overload name --------------' |
expression --------------------'
-- Daniel Wallin