Re: [boost] Re: Fresh Win32 regression test

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-11 21:14:40

At 05:51 PM 12/11/2001, mfdylan wrote:

 >But why isn't BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS #defined for gcc?  Surely that's the
 >only reason it's failing config_test (I would have thought nothing
 >should fail config_test!)

Fixed.  The actual spelling is BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM.  The test now passes.

Thanks,

--Beman