From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-09-05 15:37:40
FYI, the branch iterator_adaptors uses BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS,
and in that branch I had fixed the mispelling in the comments of config.hpp.
Beman Dawes writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
> >I have seen both used, and I'm not certain that they're different things.
>
> I don't think they are different; just two spellings of the same name:-(
>
> >Some compilers (MSVC?) have a non-standard iterator_traits definition. I
> >could be wrong, but I believe for these that we've got
> >BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS but not BOOST_NO_ITERATOR_TRAITS.
>
> I just checked; the only place in the current release
> BOOST_NO_ITERATOR_TRAITS was used was in config_test.cpp.
>
> I changed that to BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS, so AFAIK we are now
> entirely consistent.
>
> --Beman
>
>
>
>
>