From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-05 15:06:37
David Abrahams wrote:
>I have seen both used, and I'm not certain that they're different things.
I don't think they are different; just two spellings of the same name:-(
>Some compilers (MSVC?) have a non-standard iterator_traits definition. I
>could be wrong, but I believe for these that we've got
>BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS but not BOOST_NO_ITERATOR_TRAITS.
I just checked; the only place in the current release
BOOST_NO_ITERATOR_TRAITS was used was in config_test.cpp.
I changed that to BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS, so AFAIK we are now
entirely consistent.
--Beman