From: Andy Glew (glew_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 10:42:18
>For the question of "nonary_function" "nullary_function",
>"niladic_function", "voidary_function", ...
>it seems we get more and more suggestions.
>So, for the moment I stay with "nonary_function".
Sigh. "nonary" means 9-ary.
Why not say "function_0ary",
"function_1ary",
"function_2ary"
etc.
I.e. use numbers in the names?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications