$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost/include"; include("$include_dir/msg-header.inc") ?>
From: Nicolai Josuttis (nicolai.josuttis_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-18 06:44:33
Nathan Myers wrote:
>
>
> "Nonary" is abominable, but should remain as a goad until somebody
> comes up with a good reason to favor one among the others. What's
> wrong with "nonary"? First, it implies nine arguments.
>
> Of the suggestions I have seen, niladic or nullary seem best.
>
OK, I have switched to nullary (until ...)
-- Nicolai M. Josuttis Solutions in Time http://www.josuttis.de/ mailto:solutions_at_[hidden] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications