Subject: [ggl] "touches" in boost.geometry?
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz)
Date: 2011-10-20 07:09:18
Mateusz ?oskot wrote:
> On 19 October 2011 23:15, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>> It's imprecise, though it may be understood as self-contradicting.
>>>
>>> touches(A, B) is true if and only if
>>> intersect(interior(A), interior(B)) is empty
>>> and
>>> intersect(boundary(A), boundary(B)) is non-empty
>>>
>>> I think in terms of the DE-9IM and I believe it's a good
>>> idea to consider or DE-9IM ?as basis of all the geometric
>>> relation predicates. It's a generic technique.
>>
>> It would definietly increase expressiveness of GGL. I feel lack of some
>> functions describing relations between geometires. In terms of geometries
>> which are interiors+boundires there is no touches()/meets() and this
>> intersects_without_boundry() i mentioned earlier. And in terms of boundries
>> we have only overlaps().
>>
>> It would be nice if default versions of algorithms worked on geometries
>> (interiors+boundries) and there would be additional wrappers to pass
>> specific parts of the geometry.
>>
>> But is it possible with current design of GGL Barend?
>
> Yes, I'd let Barend to answer/decide as it's quite substantial issue
> for overall library.
>
> There could be an utility that calculates the intersection matrix for
> geometries anyway.
> And a generic relate(A, B) predicate resulting in the intersection
> matrix configuration.
It seems I previously have sent my reply to Mateusz only. Sorry for
inconvenience.
I've forgotten about one function - disjoint_with_boundry(). Of course
names I've used are just examples. Ideally we would have one function
and template/function parameters would describe the relationship. I
recall that we talked about it earlier and that the first template
parameter can't be used to achieve this goal:
intersects<without_boundry>(A, B); // impossible
But it probably is possible to pass wrapped geometries. Passing them
should allow us to express various relationships and it can be
implemented using existing interface.
Regards,
Adam