Subject: [ggl] Header inclusion guards
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2009-04-20 05:50:52
Barend Gehrels wrote:
>>> One thing more about this: the namespace. Should it be changed as
>>> well?
>>>
>>
>> I'd stick to Boost best practice and rename to ggl. [snipped] GIL
>> variant seems to fit GGL best
>
> OK, I'll think about it.
You're in charge. I just offer myself to do the dirty work ;-)
> One thing: if we (ever) merge the geometry cores with e.g. GTL we
> have to reconsider this. But that influences probably only the core
> part.
What is GTL?
Best regards,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net