Re: Is iterator_facade still relevant in C++11, C++17?

From: Jeff Garland (azswdude_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-14 23:21:12

I believe Zach Laine's library is the heir apparent -- it was accepted, but
isn't in boost just yet.  He describes some of the issues here:

https://tzlaine.github.io/stl_interfaces/doc/html/boost_stlinterfaces/this_library_s_relationship_to_boost_iterator.html

Jeff

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:00 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users <
boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is a bit theoretical question, but I'd like to collect some opinions.
>
> Considering sequence of C++ versions, around where, if at all,
> boost::iterator_facade shines less and becomes less relevant?
>
> In other words:
> - If you had to implement iterators in C++11, would you use it?
> - If you had to implement iterators in C++17, would you use it?
>
> Has anyone observed performance issues when using iterator_facade?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>