Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [beast] Custom, application specific header
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-03-28 14:09:56
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:44 AM, DePizzottri via Boost-users
<boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks, now I see. At first glance it wasn't obvious for me that the
> field's name stored as reinterpreted memory buffer. Is this for name, value
> and all value_type members of basic_field to lie in continuous block of
> memory, or there is another reason?
basic_fields stores the field values in their serialized
representation, this allows the header to be serialized without
allocating any memory.