Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [ASIO] Resolver question
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-24 19:45:19
On 25/02/2016 12:55, Leon Mlakar wrote:
> But that's still just a workaround, isn't it? 192.168.001.112 looks a
> perfectly good dotted-decimal address to me.
What does 192.168.077.112 mean? Is the third value 77 or 077==63? The
usual convention for 0-prefixed numbers is to treat them as octal.