Subject: [Boost-users] [interprocess] Shared memory object
From: Patrick Steele (steele.patrick_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-20 05:42:54
Hi,
can anyone tell me if there is a performance or other difference between
boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object and
boost::interprocess::windows_shared_memory? With the version of boost we
were using back in 2011 ( boost 1.48 ), we found that windows_shared_memory
operated faster than shared_memory_object when transporting around 10MB of
data. Is this still the case?
Thanks,
Patrick