Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Forthcoming Boost.Fiber review
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-19 00:43:43
> One very minor quibble (which I'll share now because I'm not sure if
> I'll be around during the formal review period): I don't like how the
> library is called "Fiber", in subdir "fiber", but in namespace "fibers".
> I do prefer namespace "fibers" (since boost::fiber::fiber would be
> annoying), but I think the library and dir should also be called
> "fibers" too.
There is precedent for this pattern in Boost:
Boost.Coroutine places its names in boost::coroutines
Boost.Tuple places its names in boost::tuples
There are probably others that don't come to mind at the moment.
Regards,
Nate