Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Problem with variadic BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM in Clang
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-14 01:16:45
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> When Paul created the code for automatically determining if a compiler
> has variadic macro support he did not include clang as among the compilers
> for which BOOST_PP_VARIADICS is 1 ( variadic support is on ). Please try
> specifically turning on variadic macro support for clang by defining
> BOOST_PP_VARIADICS=1 when you use the clang compiler.
Shouldn't this branching be inverted now that variadic macros are standard?
In other words, shouldn't it rely on BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_MACROS?
-- -Matt Calabrese