Subject: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: Adam Romanek (romanek.adam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 05:13:36
Hi,
I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and
boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's
even recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions [1].
The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is
there any "public" (documented) equivalent?
WBR,
Adam Romanek
[1] - http://www.boost.org/development/int_const_guidelines.html