Subject: Re: [Boost-users] header-only libraries
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-27 10:36:00
> Furthermore, in my experience specially commercial projects are
> reluctant to use libraries that have to be shipped with the own product,
> whereas it is no problem as long as they are "hidden" inside the binary..
It seems that you're confusing static and dynamic libs. Some boost
libraries need to be built -- but no one obligates to build them as
dynamic libs.