Subject: Re: [Boost-users] header-only libraries
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-26 13:30:47
> I'd like to use the program_options library, but am reluctant to
> require my users to build parts of Boost. Is there a strong reason that this library cannot be header-only?
FWIW, some aspects of such a question were discussed here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11363011/why-all-lib-in-boost-are-not-headers-only